DEFENDING K.A. APPLEGATE 
          Why the ending of Animorphs
          was  everything it should have been.
        Written by: Enreeco
        
                      Eight years after the conclusion of  the Animorphs, I took the time to reread the series this summer. It was a  powerful experience. I loved the series when I was younger; it was a big part  of my childhood. Amazingly, I did not feel that the series lost much of  anything when I reread it as a young adult. Like any fan of the series,  especially those with more of an attachment to Jake, Rachel, or Tobias, the  last installment in the series is quite a bit to absorb. It was a tragedy, but  it was also the ending that the series deserved.
        After paging through a great  Animorphs website by the name of Hirac Delest, I found a fanfiction by a JohnDoe  entitled “The End”. He labeled it as book number fifty-five. JohnDoe could very  well have been a ghost writer with his ability to mimic the style of writing  that was prevalent in all of the Animorphs books; however, his added conclusion  to the series destroys one of the central themes of the Animorphs – war is an  experience that defies explanation. It is an incredibly dehumanizing process,  and even the winners pay terrible costs. 
        Mrs. Applegate constantly alluded to  this in the series, especially as it came to an end. Rachel’s bloodlust,  Tobias’ loss of his humanity, and the rifts that appeared between Jake and  Cassie in their debates over what means were appropriate to achieve victory, as  well as their romance, all served to exemplify the horrors of war. Through the  books, Mrs. Applegate advanced the idea that these were serious losses that  could not simply be bandaged up like a number of readers of the series desired.  I know, because I was one of them the first time I read the series. 
         Admittedly, Tobias and Rachel were  never my favorites, but seeing Jake and Cassie pulled apart was just  depressing. Jake was never larger than life, but he did have to make larger  than life decisions.  He was a human  being that had to make decisions that are usually relegated to gods. Using his  cousin to kill his infested brother, killing 17,000 sentient beings to increase  his odds at winning a battle, and giving the order to bomb his hometown in  order to destroy the Yeerk Pool were all decisions that we as humans are not  able to make without having serious repercussions. Jake was no different.
        After rereading the series, I was just as saddened about  Jake’s fate as anyone else. He deserved a fairytale ending where he married  Cassie, saved Rachel, and was able to enjoy the world that he more than anyone  had done so much to save. Sadly, that would be a fairy tale. Animorphs was a  story about real people in adverse, scientifically fabulous situations. To deny  those six real people who we grew to love over sixty some books a real ending  would be untruthful to the entire series. 
        History, or at least my readings in  it, has more often examined the lives of corrupt and evil individuals – Mao,  Napoleon, Pinochet - who have wielded the kind of awe inspiring power that Jake  did. Mrs. Applegate examined a subject that I had not been previously exposed  to: What happens when a benevolent individual is forced to make decisions that  determine the fates of thousands of souls? Surely, Kennedy and Churchill seemed  to save face in the wake of these decisions, but I feel that their predicaments  were a bit more black and white, and certainly less personal, than the ones  Jake was forced to make. The only reasonable historical comparisons that I can  imagine are the commanders of relatively small military units who had to make  decisions that ended up costing them the lives of their friends and comrades. 
         Thankfully, Mrs. Applegate took the  time to explore this terrible phenomenon. In her short response to her readers  after the conclusion of the series, she addressed this very point. I cannot  describe the matter better than her, so I will just rely on her words:
        
          "So, you don't like the way our  little fictional war came out? You don't like Rachel dead and Tobias shattered  and Jake guilt-ridden? You don't like that one war simply led to another? Fine.  Pretty soon you'll all be of voting age, and of draft age. So when someone proposes  a war, remember that even the most necessary wars, even the rare wars where the  lines of good and evil are clear and clean, end with a lot of people dead, a  lot of people crippled, and a lot of orphans, widows and grieving parents. "
        
        This was her point. This, among other issues that  deserve separate essays, was one of the central themes of the Animorphs series.  The ending of the series made her beliefs on the matter quite clear, and the  fact that she accomplished this feat with such emotional intensity is a  testament to her skills as an author.
        Thank you for reading. If you would like to discuss this  matter, I would welcome any emails at enreeco219@yahoo.com.